Less lethal technologies
A TASER Conducted Electrical Weapon With Cardiac Biomonitoring Capability: Proof of Concept and Initial Human Trial
Looking for Answers About Less-Lethal Technologies?
Police Use of Less Lethal Force: Does Administrative Policy Matter?
Less Lethal Weapons for Law Enforcement: A Performance-Based Analysis
Using Shotguns as Less-Lethal Weapons
Less Lethal Force Policy and Police Officer Perceptions: A Multisite Examination
Less Than Lethal Force Technologies in Law Enforcement and Correctional Agencies
Injuries to Officers and Suspects in Police Use-of-Force Cases: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation
Non-Lethal Systems Research and Development: Pepper Spray Launcher/Disperser Final Report
NIJ Initiative on Less-Than-Lethal Weapons
Pepper Spray: A Safe and Reasonable Response to Suspect Verbal Resistance
Conducted Energy Devices (CEDs) and Citizen Injuries: The Shocking Empirical Reality
TECHBeat, July/August 2018
Conducted Energy Devices: Policies on Use Evolve To Reflect Research and Field Deployment Experience
NIJ Journal Issue No. 267
Are CEDs Safe and Effective?
Thousands of law enforcement agencies throughout the United States have adopted conducted energy devices (CEDs) as a safe method to subdue individuals, but are these devices really safe? What policies should agencies adopt to ensure the proper use of this technology? This NIJ Conference Panel discusses the physiological effects of electrical current in the human body caused by CEDs, as well as how this technology can reduce injuries to officers and suspects when appropriate policies and training are followed.
Use of Force and Conducted Energy Devices
Dr. Alpert discusses police use of force and conducted energy devices.
See the YouTube Terms of Service and Google Privacy Policy